I did not make that up that phrase by the way. I snatched I be hatin’ from the whirling wordpool of the too-hip-for-its-own-good Internet. It took me awhile to decipher its true meaning. At first I thought it referred to a habit of donning sporty chapeaus, but then I realized that it indicated a distinct loathing towards a certain person, place or adorable cat meme. I thought, oh no, another rap-ism torn from urban lingo and deposited into the dorky Middle American lexicon.
I’m not a righteous defender of grammar and those who are must be weeping into their overly strong mixed drinks right now. I’m not here to whine about the social network and cell phone inspired degradation of the English language. I’m here to talk about my own personal struggle against correct grammar.
I’ve already outed myself on the topic of that much maligned part of speech, the adverb. And in my last post I confessed, in a rather wounded and self-righteous way, that I received a C in my first college level creative writing course. What I haven’t yet fessed up to is that back in Junior High, in advanced English, I received a D. Gasp. But here’s the thing. I received that D for the first half of the course, which was made up entirely of diagraming sentences. Show of hands for those who enjoy this form of extreme academic torture? I really sucked at it and still do. Here’s why. In the second half of the course, which consisted of actually writing essays, short stories and articles, I received an A+. Lesson learned? Grammar is a crock. Who needs to over-analyze sentences and reduce them to a heartless mathematical formula when one has a natural sense of the language? A poetic intuition which spins sentences so admirable and dense with adjectives and adverbs that surely the like has never been penned before?
This attitude served me fairly well and after escaping the soul-sucking vortex of University English, I continued to write in my hippie-dippie fashion and garner praise and accolades from sources as far flung as Not My Immediate Family. Then came the blessed day I was asked to participate in a closed writers workshop hosted and attended by several highly regarded professional writers.
The critique of my first story through the workshop turned out to be a revelation, to say the least. It turned out that in the first scene the brocade settee was having a philosophical interior dialogue while my protagonist languished off in a dangling clause that had no business being there. The lamp had a lot to say and think about also. It was all downhill from there.
Sentence diagramming– we meet again. That D in 8th grade English had finally reared its ugly head and chomped me in my complacent butt. While I was composing to my own inner rhythm, expecting readers to follow along to a score they couldn’t see, it turned out I was confusing, confounding and misleading them into swirling backwaters of clunky phrases and awkward descriptions. However, I did not despair. Blush, yes. Writhe in humiliated agony, yes. But despair, not so much. Over the years, I’ve noticed something about this whole writing process. I’ll be sailing along, everything is clicking, the words are flowing nicely and then wham, I hit the wall, and writing becomes like chewing on bricks. I can’t pen a smooth series of lines to save my soul, and my characters walk around like robots with hemorrhoids. I have identified this pattern, which goes along these lines: in a groove, doing well, hit the plateau, plod along, and then fall off a cliff into a poorly described and cliché ridden tiger trap of self-doubt and bloody bad writing. Every time I go through this ordeal I believe that I come out a better writer. The pit of bad writing becomes slightly less bad, the precious days of good writing, a bit better. So no despair, even if it does mean diagramming sentences, 101.
As a postscript, I gave my most recent manuscript to a linguist slash writer friend of mine and discovered to my further chagrin that I have no idea what commas are, for.
And so the adventure with words continues.
meco6 said:
While I find it hard to believe that you could ever write a truly bad sentence, thanks for giving the rest of us hope.
christinalay said:
Thank you for your continuing confidence!
shadowoperator said:
My problems with grammar are a bit different: I grew up in the diagramming sentences culture, and memorizing names of grammatical fragments culture, and was quite happy and content to do these things, as my efforts were well-rewarded with good marks. It’s just a skill, or a talent, as some people have a talent with math and some don’t (I didn’t and still don’t). Many good writers have an instinctive ability to know when something sounds right or doesn’t without being able to quote a rule, and that’s all right as far as “creative” writing goes. But lately (since the trend in my high school years veered away from teaching grammar, as did the trend in my college days), I’ve found that I no longer have the grammatical abilities I used to have at ready command, and it irks me. A skill I was previously able to rely on has decayed, which in a sense is almost worse than never having been there in the first place, as it says bad things about my memory. The main penalty is that I have to do a lot of re-wording and re-writing to avoid the problems I encounter when I’m not sure how to say something correctly, and that means more revision. Anyway, my point to you is that probably people who have done a lot of reading of good literature find models there, and pick it up naturally, and even the greats have moments of slipping up: as the saying goes, “Even Homer nods.” Just keep up your reading abilities, and try to ask yourself how Dickens or Woolf or Auden would have said it, and forget about the Mrs. Grundys of grammar recitative. Conversely, you could pick up an old-style grammar book and go at it on your own, but you’d have to keep in mind that a lot of things have changed since those things were current. In any case, I think your fluency in writing speaks well for itself.
christinalay said:
I’ve always been embarrassed by my ignorance of ‘the rules’ and still have to nod blankly when I’m being told what I did wrong. But I do think you can go a long way on ‘ear’ alone. Still, I think I could save a lot of revision time if I had a better grounding. I definitely prefer the idea of reading good books over studying grammar!
lizcratty said:
Thankful for the saving grace of the rewrite.
literarylawyer said:
I was an English major but when I run into a grammar quagmire and can’t remember the rule, I take the easy way out and avoid it all together! I shutter to think what my writing would be like if I were a history major! (Yikes – there I go again overusing that pesky exclamation mark!!!)
lauraryanfedelia said:
Here Here, grammar is the bane of my existence, along with spelling and schedules.
Tammy Salyer said:
This was super fun to read, Christine! Thanks for sharing your grammar adventures, and it’s great to meet you. And hey! I’m from Eugene, too (though now living in SoCal)! *waves to the PNW*
christinalay said:
Thanks, and thanks for stopping by, Tammy. I’ve been enjoying your blog too. Eugene seems to be a writers’ haven of sorts. Can’t seem to throw a pencil without hitting one!
Tammy Salyer said:
Someone once told me that the PNW has the highest concentration of writers in the world, and I firmly believe it! It’s always nice to know one is firmly ensconced within the tribe.:D And apologies for the typo: Christina, not Christine. Best!